Key Facts
- Borussia Dortmund leads the Bundesliga by two points over Bayern; despite being in eighth place, Werder Bremen is tied on points with the fourth-place team.
- Maximilian Beier scored Dortmund’s winning goal against Stuttgart, while substitute Mitchell Weiser sealed Werder’s victory over Augsburg—both were decisive in their most recent matches.
- Dortmund has kept a clean sheet in its most recent competitive matches against Werder Bremen; which reinforces their status as favorites, even if Bremen’s earlier draw calls for caution.
- The pick is over 3.5 goals, as Borussia Dortmund has scored 15 goals in their last five games; the match against Villarreal was also high-scoring.
- Both teams to score: “No” remains a risky bet despite Werder’s recent scoring streak; Borussia Dortmund has kept three clean sheets in its last five games.
Match Preview
Niclas Füllkrug faces his former club. This adds a personal touch to Friday’s Bundesliga match at Signal Iduna Park. Under Niko Kovac, Dortmund has won all five of the listed matches and sits two points ahead of Bayern Munich. Nevertheless, the task could prove more difficult than Werder’s eighth-place standing in the standings might suggest: Daniel Thioune’s team is tied on points with the fourth-place team.
Dortmund won the last recorded competitive match between the two sides 2-0 in May 2026. Once again, the odds favor a Dortmund victory, but Werder’s improved start to the season suggests the match could be closer.
- Venue: Signal Iduna Park, Dortmund
- Date and time: Oct. 9, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
- Competition: Bundesliga (Matchday 5)
Dortmund’s 3–2 win over Villarreal CF and Werder’s 3–2 win over FC Augsburg also support the “Over 3.5 goals” bet. “Both Teams to Score: No” is also a possibility, but it’s risky given Niclas Füllkrug’s scoring streak in the league. Dortmund’s narrow win against Stuttgart argues against the handicap; however, given Werder’s absences on the left side, it remains the choice.
Dortmund Form & Record Check
Maximilian Beier scored Dortmund’s goal in the narrow 1-0 win in Stuttgart. The Bundesliga victory without conceding a goal doesn’t necessarily point to a win by a larger margin. However, the 3-0 league win against Paderborn shows that Dortmund can also win convincingly. In the 3-2 victory over Villarreal in the Champions League, there were again plenty of goals, even though Dortmund conceded some themselves.
Dortmund has won all five of the listed matches across all competitions and has scored after halftime in every game. This means the team could still pull away even if Werder puts up a fight early on. Kovac has recently relied on Felix Nmecha and Joey Veerman in midfield, who provide the foundation for sustained pressure.
Werder Form & Record Check
Mitchell Weiser came off the bench and scored the decisive goal in Werder’s 3-2 Bundesliga win over Augsburg. The comeback showed that Werder can bounce back from setbacks. However, the two goals conceded also give Dortmund’s offense hope. Niclas Füllkrug has scored in three consecutive league games. A game without a Werder goal therefore remains the riskiest prediction.
Werder also defeated Leipzig 3–1 in the league. Despite the gap in the standings, Bremen’s offense must be taken seriously. However, the team conceded goals in all four of the aforementioned Bundesliga matches, including the 1–4 loss in Freiburg. A decisive Dortmund victory therefore remains a distinct possibility.
Dortmund vs. Werder Head-to-Head & Statistics

Dortmund won 2–0 in May 2026 and 3–0 in January 2026. These were the two most recent recorded competitive matches between the teams. The two clean-sheet victories point toward handicap bets and a prediction that Dortmund will keep a clean sheet. The record of the listed league matches also supports Dortmund’s role as favorite.
Bremen’s 2–2 draw in 2025 is the clearest warning sign against betting on “Both Teams to Score: No”: If Bremen scores, the bet only pays out if Dortmund fails to score. In the two subsequent matches, however, Dortmund did not concede a goal. The bet is therefore justifiable, but remains the riskier choice.









